Speaking Out Against Hate Directed at Women: Matt Dillahunty
"When someone expresses a concern that something is making them feel unwelcome, we need to address it. Period."
"When someone expresses a concern that something is making them feel unwelcome, we need to address it. Period."
"When you hear a complaint that someone has raised, you might think that they’re expressing an irrational, emotional, over-reaction to the situation. You might even be correct – but it doesn’t matter, and here’s why:
You don’t get to decide what someone else finds offensive.
You don’t get to decide what someone else finds uncomfortable, unwelcoming, disconcerting, stressful, harassing, troubling or painful."
I fully support Dillahunty's position here. How to reconcile this with the value that no one has the right to not be offended? (I'm just trying to process his words here)
- Women are being excluded from the skeptical/atheist community by some ingrained and outdated attitudes that get expressed. Mostly there is no intent to exclude but because of a lack of empathy, there is insensitivity to what is offensive, excluding, and threatening.
- The community wants women involved and active. Any who don't aren't really part of the community.
- If I offend someone in the community who I want to ally with, then I need to understand why. Not take offense that they took offense.
- This doesn't mean my free speech rights are curtailed or have limits.
- It doesn't mean women have the right to not be offended.
- It means I need to re-look at what and how I say things. Or reassess my membership in the community.
- Is this censorship? Not if it is an increase in understanding and knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment